• Lush – De-Luxe
  • Oasis – Champagne Supernova
  • PF Project – Choose Life
  • The Butthole Surfers – The Hurdy Gurdy Man
  • The Smiths – Sheila Take A Bow
  • Husker Du – Eight Miles High
  • Deftones – Wax and Wane
  • Bangles – Hazy Shade Of Winter
  • Billy Idol – Rebel Yell
  • Candlemass – Solitude
  • Sinead O’Connor – I Am Stretched On Your Grave
  • Leo Moracchioli – Thunderstruck
  • Motorhead – Louie Louie
  • Me First And The Gimme Gimmes – I’m So Lonesome I Could Cry
  • Depeche Mode – Never Let Me Down Again (Split Mix)


Lo, when the gallant knight did draw his sword,
And spake, “It is the longest I have known,”
The lady fair, with wit and jest, did say,
“That’s what she said,” then laughed as it was told.

Leo Tolstoy

In the grand manor of the Rostovs, amidst the evening’s light, the count, with a knowing smile, held forth a splendid loaf of bread. “This,” he declared, “is the largest I have ever seen.” Natasha, ever quick-witted, glanced up from her embroidery. “Indeed,” she murmured softly, her eyes twinkling with mischief, “that’s what she said.” The room, heavy with the weight of Russian aristocracy, echoed with restrained laughter, the jest a fleeting respite from the tumult of their lives.

Jack Kerouac

We were somewhere on the edge of the road, Dean and I, chasing the wild spirit of America, when he pulled out a map. “Man, this is the biggest spread I’ve ever seen,” he said, eyes wide with wonder. Marylou, lounging in the backseat, smirked and blew a wisp of smoke. “Yeah,” she said, voice lazy and cool, “that’s what she said.” The car hummed along, the road stretching infinitely ahead, laughter mingling with the roar of the engine as we chased the endless horizon.

Kurt Vonnegut

In the cluttered kitchen of an old Tralfamadorian house, Billy Pilgrim held up an alien device, marveling at its bizarre, oversized design. “This thing,” he said, “is the biggest I’ve ever seen.” Without missing a beat, Montana Wildhack, reclining nearby, quipped, “That’s what she said.” And so it goes. The universe, with its infinite absurdities, continued to spin, and the moment was but another grain of sand in the hourglass of time.


While Bob Mould’s cover of “Eight Miles High” with Husker Du is undoubtedly intense and anguished, there’s no definitive evidence to suggest it was directly linked to amphetamine withdrawal. It’s important to note that this interpretation is primarily based on fan speculation and hasn’t been explicitly confirmed by Mould or other band members.

However, there are some elements that support this interpretation:

  • Mould’s performance: His vocals are raw, strained, and emotionally charged, which could be seen as a reflection of personal struggles.
  • The song’s context: The original “Eight Miles High” is about the transcendent experience of flight and psychedelics. Husker Du’s version strips away the dreamy atmosphere and replaces it with a raw, aggressive energy that could be interpreted as a darker, more personal experience.
  • The band’s history: Husker Du was known for their intense live performances and emotionally charged music, often dealing with themes of alienation, anger, and inner turmoil.

On the other hand, some factors challenge this interpretation:

  • No official confirmation: Neither Mould nor other band members have explicitly stated that the cover was about amphetamine withdrawal.
  • Alternative interpretations: The song’s intensity could be attributed to the band’s overall musical style or a deliberate attempt to subvert the original’s meaning.
  • Mould’s personal life: While Mould has been open about his struggles with addiction, he hasn’t specifically linked this song to his experiences with amphetamines.

Ultimately, whether or not the song is about amphetamine withdrawal remains open to interpretation. While there’s no concrete evidence to support or refute this claim, the intensity of Mould’s performance and the song’s context have led many fans to believe that it reflects a personal struggle. If you’d like to explore this further, you can research interviews with Bob Mould and other band members, or read articles and analyses of the song.

It’s a compelling perspective to consider the tenure of Richard Nixon and the initiation of the Iraq War as two significant moments that intensified public distrust in political leadership, although the contexts and specifics of these events differ considerably.

Richard Nixon and Watergate:
Richard Nixon’s presidency is often marked by the Watergate scandal, which broke out in the early 1970s. The scandal stemmed from the Nixon administration’s attempts to cover up its involvement in the June 1972 break-in at the Democratic National Committee headquarters at the Watergate office complex. Nixon’s role in the cover-up, once revealed, caused severe political fallout and led to his resignation in 1974. This event is widely regarded as a seminal moment in American political history that deeply eroded public trust in the federal government. It exposed a level of manipulation, deceit, and abuse of power that many Americans hadn’t previously realized was possible at the highest levels of government.

The Iraq War:
Fast forward to 2003, the U.S. government, under President George W. Bush, initiated the Iraq War primarily on the assertions that Saddam Hussein’s regime possessed weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) and posed a significant threat to international security. These claims were used to justify the invasion, but subsequent investigations revealed that such weapons did not exist and that intelligence had been exaggerated or misinterpreted. The realization that the war was founded on false pretenses further exacerbated public cynicism towards the U.S. government, mirroring in some ways the disillusionment that followed the Watergate scandal.

Comparative Analysis:
Both events are key examples of how perceived or real deceit at high government levels can lead to a significant erosion of trust. In Nixon’s case, the issue was the illegal activities and subsequent cover-up directly involving the President. In the case of the Iraq War, it was about potentially misleading public statements and intelligence reports that were used to make high-stakes policy decisions.

While Nixon’s impact was profound on the immediate perception of presidential integrity, the Iraq War’s implications were broader on international relations and military ethics. Both events undeniably contributed to a political landscape where public skepticism towards government motives and honesty became more pronounced.

However, it’s important to recognize that issues of trust in political institutions have complex origins and are influenced by numerous other events and factors beyond these two cases. The Vietnam War, the Pentagon Papers, and various political and financial scandals have also played significant roles in shaping public attitudes toward the U.S. government. Each event can be seen as part of a broader tapestry that depicts evolving public sentiment regarding political authority and governance.